Mirava vs ParityAppKit
ParityAppKit localizes App Store prices with PPP. Mirava adds Google Play, app-spend data, and a free audit. Here is how they compare.
Public App Store data · No signup · ~60 seconds
Also compare with: Price LocalizeBasePricePPP Price PlannerPricePush
What powers the price
ParityAppKit uses updated purchasing power parity indices to compute a price for every App Store country, keeps display prices tax-inclusive where the store requires it, and lets you override any country by hand. It is a well-built App Store pricing tool with nice touches like local version history and one-click rollback.
Mirava starts from the Mirava Index, built from app subscription data rather than a PPP index alone. PPP estimates general purchasing power. The Mirava Index reflects what people pay for apps. On top of it you can choose PPP or a custom ratio, and a willingness-to-pay model adjusts for category and platform.
Feature comparison
| Mirava | ParityAppKit | |
|---|---|---|
| Price basis | Mirava Index (app subscription data), plus PPP and custom ratios | PPP indices |
| Stores | App Store + Google Play | App Store |
| Countries covered | 170+ (both stores) | 175 (App Store) |
| Push to store | Yes, one workflow | Yes, one click |
| Per-country override | Yes | Yes |
| Version history / rollback | Change tracking in the dashboard | Yes, local rollback |
| Willingness-to-pay model | Yes | Not offered |
| Free audit, no signup | Yes, 60 seconds | Not offered |
Based on each tool's public website, checked September 2026.
Why teams pick Mirava over ParityAppKit
Both stores, not just the App Store
ParityAppKit covers the App Store only. Mirava manages App Store and Google Play in one workflow.
App-spend data, not PPP alone
The Mirava Index is calibrated to app subscription behavior, so the recommendation reflects app demand rather than a country's general cost of living.
Check your prices for free first
Mirava's free 60-second audit shows how far each market is from the recommendation, with no signup and no card.
Which one fits
If you are App Store only and want a tidy, native PPP tool with rollback and tax-inclusive display, ParityAppKit does that job well.
If you ship on both stores and want to start from app-spend data with a willingness-to-pay model, and audit your current prices for free first, Mirava is the closer fit.
The fastest way to tell is to run the numbers on your own app. A free audit takes about 60 seconds and shows where your prices are leaving revenue on the table.
Frequently asked questions
What is the main difference between Mirava and ParityAppKit?
ParityAppKit localizes App Store prices for 175 countries using purchasing power parity, with tax-inclusive display, per-country overrides, and version rollback. Mirava covers both the App Store and Google Play, bases its recommendation on the Mirava Index (app subscription data) plus a willingness-to-pay model, and includes a free no-signup audit.
Does ParityAppKit support Google Play?
ParityAppKit focuses on the App Store and its 175 App Store countries. Mirava manages App Store and Google Play in one workflow.
Do both handle tax and rounding?
Yes. ParityAppKit shows tax-inclusive prices where the store requires it and rounds per country. Mirava applies region-aware psychological rounding and relies on the stores' official tiers for tax handling.
Compare with another tool
Weighing a different one? Every comparison follows the same structure.
See where your app is mispriced
Run a free audit on your own app in about 60 seconds. No signup, no card.
